Blog

Visa Processing Fees to Change on April 13, 2012


Media Note – US Department of State

Office of the Spokesperson
Washington, DC

Effective April 13, 2012, the Department of State will adjust visa processing fees. The fees for most non-immigrant visa applications and Border Crossing Cards will increase, while all immigrant visa processing fees will decrease.

Although most categories of non-immigrant visa processing fees will increase, the fee for E visas (treaty-traders and treaty-investors) and K visas (for fiancé(e)s of U.S. citizens) will decrease. To see all the new fees visit the following link:

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/03/187114.htm


H-1B Season Will Start April 2nd!

The next H-1B filing season begins April 2, 2012 for jobs with a start date on October 1, 2012.  Most commentators agree that the cap will be exhausted rapidly this year. If you think you will need to file a new H-1B petition you should contact an attorney immediately.


Great News for family members of US Citizens – USCIS to Propose Changing the Process for Waivers

On Jan. 6, 2012, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) posted a notice of intent in the Federal Register outlining its plan to reduce the time that U.S. citizens are separated from their spouses and children under certain circumstances while those family members go through the process of becoming legal immigrants to the United States.  Currently, spouses and sons and daughters of U.S. citizens who have accrued a certain period of unlawful presence in the United States, and have to leave the country as part of the legal immigration process, are barred from returning to their families for as long as 3 or 10 years.  They can receive a waiver to allow them to return to their families by showing that their U.S. citizen family member would face extreme hardship as a result of the separation.  This proposal would streamline the processing of these individuals’ waiver applications based on unlawful presence; USCIS proposes to process their waiver applications in the United States before any American family faces separation.  The process would only apply to immigrants who are eligible for a visa.

http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/menuitem.5af9bb95919f35e66f614176543f6d1a/?vgnextoid=95356a0d87aa4310VgnVCM100000082ca60aRCRD&vgnextchannel=8a2f6d26d17df110VgnVCM1000004718190aRCRD


Don’t Think That You Will Get Away With This ONe

Canadian man passes US border using his iPad

A Canadian man who realised that he had left his passport at home as he approached the US border managed to cross over by using his Apple IPad.

iPad explainer video NEW STILL

Martin Reisch managed to use his Apple iPad to gain entry into the US. Photograph: guardian.co.uk
It’s best not to forget your passport even if you are from a Visa Waiver Country.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/04/canadian-man-ipad-us-border-control


Are California Lawyers still Predominantly White and Male?

Bar Numbers

Predominantly white male State Bar changing … slowly

Although diversity in the ranks of California lawyers has increased over the last decade, change is occurring slowly and the vast majority of attorneys in the state remain male and white. The results of a survey of randomly selected lawyers conducted last month also reveal that the state’s attorney population still doesn’t come close to reflecting California’s demographic makeup, as reported in the 2010 census.

The percentage of female attorneys in California has continued to slowly increase, reaching 39.4 percent in the current survey, compared with just 26 percent 20 years ago, 32 percent in 2001 and 34 percent in 2006.

Diversification by ethnic group also continued to increase but at a substantially slower pace. The percentage of white attorneys has dropped to 79.3 percent, compared with 91 percent in 1991, 83 percent in 2001 and 84.4 percent five years ago.

The survey also found that the state’s lawyers are graying: Nearly half (48 percent) are 55 or older, compared with just 14 percent in 1991, and half have been practicing law for 20 years or more.

Other highlights of the online survey, conducted by Hertz Research of Bodega Bay over a 10-day period at the end of November and the beginning of December, include:

  • Fully two-thirds work in private practice.
  • Among those in private practice, 47 percent work as sole practitioners, somewhat lower than the 54 percent who practiced alone in 2006.
  • 58 percent said they do pro bono work, with the largest group — 39 percent — volunteering their services for between one and 25 hours.
  • Despite the widespread popularity of such social media as Facebook and Twitter, only 14 percent of the survey’s respondents said they use such outlets in their legal practice.
  • More than two-thirds — 68 percent — said they found MCLE courses “helpful or informative” and nearly half — 48 percent — pay for continuing legal education courses themselves.
  • More than half (52 percent) said they are not certain if substance abuse is a particular problem among lawyers.
  • Forty-two percent work in southern California — Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, San Diego, Santa Barbara and Ventura counties. The San Francisco Bay Area accounts for 23 percent of the state’s lawyers.
  • Not surprisingly, 60 percent of the respondents said bar dues, currently $410 per year, are too high.

The survey was commissioned by the board of governors in September as one of a series of membership surveys, conducted roughly every five years, to update demographic data on State Bar members and how they practice law in order to assist with projecting trends in the legal profession and to track other data of relevance to the profession. Questions were sent via email to a random sampling of 10,000 active and inactive lawyers, garnering 1,820 responses by the return deadline. The survey also was posted online at the bar’s website, where another 448 members responded to the 50-question inquiry.

Bar members were surveyed in the 1990s by SRI International and Rand. Hertz Research conducted the current survey as well as the 2001 and 2006 studies. In addition to assessing demographic changes, the survey also measured member sentiment about other topics including MCLE, the bar’s member benefit programs, its website and the California Bar Journal.

Although women account for anywhere between 40 percent and 52 percent of law students and the number of practicing women lawyers in California is on the rise, they still account for fewer lawyers than men. And they lag behind their overall 50.3 percentage of the California population. An article in AM Law Daily last spring suggested that continued bad press about the lack of discernible growth in female leadership positions in large law firms and legal departments may be causing a decline in the number of female applicants to law school. The article, which reported a steady decline in female enrollment in law schools since 2002, also said the numbers at the top 10 law schools show that women make up around 40 percent of law students, with the exception of UC Berkeley’s Boalt Hall, with a female law student population of 52.9 percent.

As for the ethnicity of the state’s lawyers, the changes among lawyers of color are occurring at a snail’s pace, with most of the increases among those of Asian or Pacific Islander descent. The percentage of attorneys in those groups doubled between 1991 and 2001, from 3 to 6 percent, but then climbed by just 1.7 percent over the next 10 years to the current 7.7 percent.

The numbers of Latino and African-American attorneys has remained virtually static. In 1991, 3 percent of the state’s lawyers were Latino, 3.7 percent in 2001 and 4.2 percent today. Latinos make up 37.6 percent of California’s population.

The number of African-Americans lawyers also has changed little over the years and account for an even smaller percentage of bar membership — 2 percent in 1991, 2.4 percent in 2001, 1.7 percent in 2006 and 2.7 percent today. African-Americans make up 6.2 percent of the state’s population.

Attorneys seem to be working a little harder than they were five years ago: 31 percent said they work at least 50 hours per week, compared with 28 percent in 2006. On the other hand, the highest number — 29 percent — work between 41-49 hours today.

In addition, the vast majority — 68 percent — earn under $150,000 annually from their legal practice, compared with 74 percent in 2006. Those earning between $200,000-$300,000 or more than $300,000 each crept up by one percentage point, from 8 to 9 percent and 7 to 8 percent respectively.

The survey results also suggest the harsh economy may be having a negative impact on some lawyers as well. Among the 11 percent who said they are “actively seeking work as attorney,” 31 percent said they’d been looking for legal work for one to two years and another 29 percent said the job hunt had gone on for more than two years. Another 30 percent said they’d been looking for work as a lawyer for between three months and a year.

The survey also found that more than half the respondents (52 percent) rarely visit the State Bar website. Site visitors said they found the attorney search function, MCLE information and paying dues online the most useful features. Sixty percent have taken an online MCLE course, about one-third have called the Ethics Hotline, more than three-quarters have not used the bar’s discount or insurance programs, and 70 percent said they read at least part of the monthly California Bar Journal, primarily for legal news or discipline summaries.


© 2011 The State Bar of California

US Supreme Court to Weigh Arizona Statute on Immigration

The Obama administration  sued to block four parts of Arizona’s immigration law.

The challenged provisions include the following: a requirement that state law enforcement officials determine the immigration status of anyone they stop or arrest if officials have reason to believe that the individual might be an illegal immigrant. A requirment that the immigration status of people who are arrested be determined before they are released.The law makes it a crime under state law for immigrants to fail to register under a federal law and for illegal immigrants to work or to try find work. In addition, it allows the police to arrest people without warrants if they have probable cause to believe that they have done things that would make them deportable under federal law. This last provision is especially controversial because many believe it will result in ethic and/or racial profiling.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in San Francisco, had previously blocked all four provisions. Arizona is part of the Ninth Circuit and subject to that court’s decisions on the constitutionality of it’s laws. The Supreme Court will be reviewing the lower court’s decision to block the law.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/13/us/supreme-court-to-rule-on-immigration-law-in-arizona.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=tha2


Online Visa Application Site is Down

The Department of State has advised that the DS 160 sit is down.

The online Consular Electronic Application Center (CEAC) required to complete the DS-160 is down. The Visa Office has advised AILA that they are working to resolve the problem but no further information has been provided. Watch here for more details.


Bar exam pass rate holds steady at 54.8 percent

 

The pass rate for the July exam had been steadily rising since July 2004, when it hit a low point of 48.2 percent, until 2008, when it peaked at 61.7 percent. The pass rate was 48.8 percent in 2005, 51.8 in 2006 and 56.1 percent in 2007. It dipped again in 2009 to 56.4 percent.

The number of applicants also declined, from 8,667 in 2009 to 8,562 in 2010 and 8,456 this year. Nearly 72 percent — 6,080 — were first-time test takers and they scored a pass rate of 69 percent. The pass rate for the 2,376 repeaters was 18 percent.


House Committee Approves Bill to Eliminate Per-Country Visa Caps

The  House Judiciary Committee Approved H.R. 3012, also called the Fairness for High Skilled Immigrants Act.  The bill would eliminate the per-country numerical limitation for employment-based visas.  Next it will move to consideration on the House floor.  If enacted, the bill would create a strictly “first in, first out” system (based on priority dates) within the existing employment-based green card system over a three year period. The measure would also immediately increase the family-based per country cap.

The bill is co-sponsored by Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), who said he supports the bill because “some countries have more of the skilled workers that American employers want, but natives of these countries must often wait years longer for green cards than natives of other countries.”  For example, in the employment-based second preference category for professionals with advanced degrees and aliens of exceptional ability, green cards are immediately available to approved applicants from most countries. However, workers from India and China must wait four years or more to obtain a green card.  Similarly, in the EB-3 category, for professionals with a bachelor’s degree and skilled workers, green cards are available to applicants from most countries who applied on or before December 2005. Immigrants from China can obtain green cards if they applied before August 2004, and Indians can obtain green cards if they applied before July 2002.

Chaffetz hailed the bill as good for jobs and the economy, saying, “We need to fix our legal immigration system,” and while this bill “doesn’t solve all of our woes, it takes an important step forward.”  Chaffetz called the legislation “pro-growth, pro-jobs, and pro-innovation.”
Chances of passage appear very good. According to Charles Oppenheim, who calculates visa availability for the Deparment of State’s Visa Bulletin, the likely effect is to create a shorter waiting list for EB 2 with the same backlog for all countries.


H-1B Cap Reached for Fiscal Year 2012

USCIS announced today that it has received a sufficient number of H-1B petitions to reach the statutory cap of 65,000 for fiscal year (FY) 2012. USCIS is notifying the public that yesterday, Nov. 22, 2011, was the final receipt date for new H-1B specialty occupation petitions requesting an employment start date in FY 2012.